I just thought of a good idea for a brief comedy sketch, or perhaps new Reddit cartoon meme...
1. Take a ridiculous product I just saw on a commercial - the kind it looks like someone put little to no effort into thinking of, yet it will make millions. Perhaps Taco Bell's new burrito with Doritos chips in it.
2. Show the board meeting where they're trying to think of a new idea. The CEO will be all like "alright, so far we've done a taco with lettuce and cheese, a taco with lettuce and cheese and sour cream, a burrito with beef, cheese, and sour cream, a burrito with beef, cheese, reheated freeze-dried potatoes and sour cream, a quesadilla with chicken, a flatbread quesadilla with chicken, a burrito with Fritos chips in it... where do we go from here?"
3. Some goober raises his hand and says "maybe a burrito with Doritos chips in it."
4. The CEO looks at the goober guy, displays a contented smile, picks up a large bag with a $$$ sign on it, and hands it to the goober guy. End sketch/cartoon.
I think that shit would be funny if it was a recurring thing.
There's an inventor in Japan who believes that a person's most profound ideas will culminate under water, moments prior to passing out from oxygen deprivation. I know I always feel smart in the shower, even if I sometimes forget if I washed my hair five minutes ago. Sometimes I think of recipes too. Have a read.
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Saturday, March 3, 2012
Contraceptives and Cheeseburgers
What many people don't seem to understand about Rush Limbaugh is the fact that the occasional everyone-hates-him-even-more-now controversy is just more publicity for him. Getting more listeners, for whatever reason, is good for his career.
Recently, everyone has been jumping all over Rush for making statements about a college aged girl, who, in front of Congress, advocated the covering of contraceptives under university health care. Rush asserted that this equates to having her university pay for her to have lots of sex, making her a "slut." He also made some comment inferring that he would consent to such coverage as long as he gets to watch. Just thought I'd mention that.
It is Rush's right to say those kinds of things on the air. I don't know if that's what the Constitution's founders quite expected when they wrote the First Amendment, but hey, times change I guess. Conversely, it's my right to make negative statements about those who fall under his political/social affiliation, who seem to have dubbed him as some sort of a leader. Conservatives, you chose him - I didn't choose him.
Bear in mind, I do not consider myself a liberal - I consider myself a common sense voter who just happens to have much more of a disdain for conservatives than for any other political demographic.
What I mainly want to get at is this - a message to the leader of the conservative party himself. Rush, if you have an issue with a university or an employer "paying someone to have sex" in such a convoluted, indirect manner, then I, as a health-conscious person, have the right to say that I don't approve of your employer paying for you to smoke cigars and eat cheeseburgers. I would imagine your future quadruple bypass will cost a lot more than a young woman's birth control prescription during the four years she's at a university.
Recently, everyone has been jumping all over Rush for making statements about a college aged girl, who, in front of Congress, advocated the covering of contraceptives under university health care. Rush asserted that this equates to having her university pay for her to have lots of sex, making her a "slut." He also made some comment inferring that he would consent to such coverage as long as he gets to watch. Just thought I'd mention that.
It is Rush's right to say those kinds of things on the air. I don't know if that's what the Constitution's founders quite expected when they wrote the First Amendment, but hey, times change I guess. Conversely, it's my right to make negative statements about those who fall under his political/social affiliation, who seem to have dubbed him as some sort of a leader. Conservatives, you chose him - I didn't choose him.
Bear in mind, I do not consider myself a liberal - I consider myself a common sense voter who just happens to have much more of a disdain for conservatives than for any other political demographic.
| (Photo from newsone.com) |
What I mainly want to get at is this - a message to the leader of the conservative party himself. Rush, if you have an issue with a university or an employer "paying someone to have sex" in such a convoluted, indirect manner, then I, as a health-conscious person, have the right to say that I don't approve of your employer paying for you to smoke cigars and eat cheeseburgers. I would imagine your future quadruple bypass will cost a lot more than a young woman's birth control prescription during the four years she's at a university.
Friday, February 24, 2012
"Catchy" and "True" Are Two Different Things
"Those Who Stand For Nothing Fall For Anything"
I saw that phrase written on a sign outside of a church in Newtown today. Sounds kind of catchy - I'm sure plenty of people read it and went "wow, yeah, that's smart." While I was driving, I analyzed this saying.
Presumably, when a church mentions "those who stand for nothing," they are referring to atheists and/or agnostics. Saying that they "fall for anything" infers that such people are gullible, easily influenced, easily persuaded, etc.
So, in other words, the phrase means "Atheists and agnostics are easily persuaded."
The reason people such as myself fall under the category "agnostic" is because we aren't easily persuaded. If we were easily persuaded, we might believe in strange magical stories. I once heard a story that asserts that humans are evil because a woman cloned from a human bone ate an apple (a snake told her to), and the only way mankind can be saved from being eternally pitchforked by a goatman (he was also the snake) is to pray to a zombie. I wasn't persuaded.
Thursday, February 23, 2012
I Respect You, But I Don't Respect Your Beliefs
WARNING: Before reading this post, be aware that those some may consider these ideas irreverent or offensive. If you do not believe you should continue, then do not continue.
As someone who comes from very liberal parents (one Protestant by background, one Jewish by background), and some very conservative (and religious) extended family, I've developed what I consider to be a somewhat more-than-typically-nuanced social outlook. My very liberal parents, in a leftist-reactionary manner, would probably proclaim that it is very important to respect and accept all religions. To them, I might ask "why?" Really, think about this question: why should I?
No society expects its members to respect every belief or every action of every person. The majority of us don't respect the beliefs of gang members, violent criminals, white supremacists, radical cult members, terrorists, etc. We do not respect these people's outlooks or opinions, because they are hateful, violent, or obsolete. Religion is nothing more than a series of outlooks and beliefs too, but is held to different standard. I believe it's because religion, usually, is old. It's traditional. It's historic. We respect these concepts, even if meaninglessly so.
If there's one aspect of a person we SHOULD be permitted to display intolerance for, it should be their opinions and their actions. Look at it this way: there is no reason to disrespect people based on race, sexual orientation, gender, hair color, height, physical disability, etc. These are traits people are born with, without choice. It's simply cowardly to hate people for these aspects - no room for debate. And, as I stated, I don't have hatred for the actual people who choose to follow organized religions. I have Catholic (or "Catholic Lite") friends and family, but I won't accept their religious tenets, just as they wouldn't accept all of my personal beliefs, opinions, or preferences. This isn't a far cry from the fact that I absolutely hate country music, but still might have some friends who listen to it.
There are those who perceive themselves as practicing churchgoers/mosquegoers/templegoers/whatever, yet disconnect themselves from the mainstream or orthodox religious population. There are Christians who call themselves liberal, there are Muslims who want nothing to do with Middle Eastern politics, and there are Jews who reject the self-righteous phrase "the chosen people." These are kind, open-minded people trying to hang on to an aspect of their family history and their childhood, but clearly they know something is inherently wrong with the religions they follow. Christianity does not permit picking and choosing which parts of the Bible are the most agreeable, and disregarding the entire Old Testament for being too mean and scary. There ought to come a time when these people just accept what they need to accept, and leave religion behind them.
I do have to confess, this post is somewhat reactionary. In part, this was inspired by the rhetoric of some of the GOP presidential candidates, all of whom are idiots (even Ron Paul, who seems likeable as long as you don't delve too deep). In part, it was also inspired by the recent deaths in Afghanistan, which served as a retaliation for the accidental burning of a few Kurans. I can barely wrap my head around it: taking innocent lives to compensate for the burning of useless pieces of paper. There is little doubt in my mind that more than 99% of Muslims probably agree with me that this is an abomination, and yet another unnecessary, ugly scar on the face of Islam. But there is also little doubt in my mind that the world would be a better place if every follower, peaceful and otherwise, gave it up like a drug.
Thursday, February 9, 2012
Sorry I Didn't Call You Back
I'm a 27 year old who lives with his parents, works as a waiter, makes about 25k a year, and listens to metal. What do you want to talk to me about?
I persistently forget to call people back, text people back, email people. I have family members who want to keep in touch with me and know what I'm up to. I have friends I haven't seen in a year or two who want to re-establish their friendships with me. They're probably all wondering why I neglect to get back to them.
The truth is, I don't have a lot to say. Nothing has changed recently. I still do the same things, I still live at home, I still have no career path, and I still haven't done anything artistically extraordinary. My family members don't want to hear about the metal show I'm excited about going to next month. They also don't want to discuss religion or politics with me, as I can't stand religion and I don't lean right the same way much of my family does.
My girlfriend is in the same boat. She's also a restaurant server, she hasn't really had much luck finding auditions or doing any singing/acting, and she lives with her parents too. She and I spend a lot of time just watching cooking shows together, very occasionally going out to eat and have drinks, or seeing the few friends who have a lot in common with us. We just aren't exciting people.
Many of my old friends have decent jobs, live with their spouses (some married, some not), go on exciting vacations, etc. What am I going to tell them about? A lot of them are into beer and cooking and stuff the same way I am, but how long can we hold a conversation about things we like to ingest? I guess I can talk music with some of them, but it usually just turns into each of us trying to one-up each other, or wait for the other person to finish talking about a band I don't care about so I can tell them about a band they don't care about.
A friend of mine contacted me a month or two ago saying I should call him back and plan a visit. He lives in NYC and makes a lot of money. Taking a weekend off is kind of a big deal in my profession, and I can't just neglect to make money every time a friend or relative wants me to visit them - especially considering how little money I make even if I take no time off. Don't get me wrong, in my job I can make a lot of money in a short amount of time. However, those short amounts of time are few and far between.
So, I'm sorry if you haven't heard from me lately. I'll try to get back to you, but don't expect to have your mind blown.
I persistently forget to call people back, text people back, email people. I have family members who want to keep in touch with me and know what I'm up to. I have friends I haven't seen in a year or two who want to re-establish their friendships with me. They're probably all wondering why I neglect to get back to them.
The truth is, I don't have a lot to say. Nothing has changed recently. I still do the same things, I still live at home, I still have no career path, and I still haven't done anything artistically extraordinary. My family members don't want to hear about the metal show I'm excited about going to next month. They also don't want to discuss religion or politics with me, as I can't stand religion and I don't lean right the same way much of my family does.
My girlfriend is in the same boat. She's also a restaurant server, she hasn't really had much luck finding auditions or doing any singing/acting, and she lives with her parents too. She and I spend a lot of time just watching cooking shows together, very occasionally going out to eat and have drinks, or seeing the few friends who have a lot in common with us. We just aren't exciting people.
Many of my old friends have decent jobs, live with their spouses (some married, some not), go on exciting vacations, etc. What am I going to tell them about? A lot of them are into beer and cooking and stuff the same way I am, but how long can we hold a conversation about things we like to ingest? I guess I can talk music with some of them, but it usually just turns into each of us trying to one-up each other, or wait for the other person to finish talking about a band I don't care about so I can tell them about a band they don't care about.
A friend of mine contacted me a month or two ago saying I should call him back and plan a visit. He lives in NYC and makes a lot of money. Taking a weekend off is kind of a big deal in my profession, and I can't just neglect to make money every time a friend or relative wants me to visit them - especially considering how little money I make even if I take no time off. Don't get me wrong, in my job I can make a lot of money in a short amount of time. However, those short amounts of time are few and far between.
So, I'm sorry if you haven't heard from me lately. I'll try to get back to you, but don't expect to have your mind blown.
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Newspapers, Mom, Media, Trolls
My mom has been working in the newspaper business for most of my life. At work, she edits news. At home, she watches news. In the car, she listens to the news. On the weekends, she reads the New York Times.
I guess I'm similar with cooking and beer. At work, I serve people food and drinks. At home, I cook and come up with recipes. On my nights off, I like to have beer with my friends.
However, I am certainly noticing the disparity between my mom's generation and my generation. Take my brother and I, for example. We're people of the Internet age. While my parents certainly use computers and the Internet a lot (my mom is at a computer all day), we absorb the world differently.
My brother and I have trouble understanding newspapers, though we certainly recognize our mother's passion and interest for her medium. For us, all the information we could ever need comes shooting out of a thin box with a screen attached to it. So when my mom talks about how much she loves the New York Times because there's something in it for everyone, I can't help but think to myself "but if you want to know about something, why not just hop online and use Google?"
Perhaps this will incite an inflammatory response from those who think technological advancement and digital media are somehow tarnishing the art of reporting, the art of writing, etc. Or that these phenomena are over-saturating people with information, making it more difficult to vet through what's reliable and unreliable, what's substantial and what's "fluff." In my opinion, these are probably the same people who think that Amazon Kindle is a bad invention because it makes physical books obsolete, despite the fact that it reduces paper waste and clutter, and allows consumers to obtain more books without spending a fortune.
Seriously, books are unnecessarily expensive. The printing press has been around for a LONG time.
As usual, I've digressed. The bombardment of information we receive in the digital age is difficult for me to make judgement on. On one hand, people should be abundantly knowledgeable about their world, about the things they purchase, the people they vote for, the religions they follow, etc. On the other hand, people's capability to get any information they want at their fingertips has made everyone a critic. Not everyone should be a critic. When everyone becomes a critic, trolls are born:
What is there to be so critical about? The world, while certainly trashy depending on where you look, is pretty unbelievable. There's a lot we take for granted. We are able to watch videos and access information and talk to other people any time we want. That's pretty amazing! Hell, it's pretty amazing that if we want to go to another part of the world, we're able to hop into a machine with wheels attached to it that can shoot us across paths ten times faster than we can run. Maybe more, I'm not sure how fast the average person can run. Or we can get access to a machine that FLIES IN THE SKY. How are we not impressed by this??? Even simple things are amazing. If it's the middle of winter and we want ripe, delicious heirloom tomatoes, we just hop in our wheeled machines and buy some in a convenient, well-stocked, heated building.
Still, I even hypocritically find myself getting mad when my Internet is slow. And when I say mad, I mean kind of indignant. How dare the computer try to think about something else other than what I'm commanding it to think about. Every time I try to click on a video, and the computer does that thirty second "hold on, I need a minute here" freeze, my outrage is unparalleled. "I don't fucking care about a McAfee update right now! You do what I click on you to do!" Seriously though, the people at Windows, iTunes, and McAfee could take a break every once in a while. Enough updates, says this troll.
I think I'm done talking.
I guess I'm similar with cooking and beer. At work, I serve people food and drinks. At home, I cook and come up with recipes. On my nights off, I like to have beer with my friends.
However, I am certainly noticing the disparity between my mom's generation and my generation. Take my brother and I, for example. We're people of the Internet age. While my parents certainly use computers and the Internet a lot (my mom is at a computer all day), we absorb the world differently.
My brother and I have trouble understanding newspapers, though we certainly recognize our mother's passion and interest for her medium. For us, all the information we could ever need comes shooting out of a thin box with a screen attached to it. So when my mom talks about how much she loves the New York Times because there's something in it for everyone, I can't help but think to myself "but if you want to know about something, why not just hop online and use Google?"
Perhaps this will incite an inflammatory response from those who think technological advancement and digital media are somehow tarnishing the art of reporting, the art of writing, etc. Or that these phenomena are over-saturating people with information, making it more difficult to vet through what's reliable and unreliable, what's substantial and what's "fluff." In my opinion, these are probably the same people who think that Amazon Kindle is a bad invention because it makes physical books obsolete, despite the fact that it reduces paper waste and clutter, and allows consumers to obtain more books without spending a fortune.
Seriously, books are unnecessarily expensive. The printing press has been around for a LONG time.
As usual, I've digressed. The bombardment of information we receive in the digital age is difficult for me to make judgement on. On one hand, people should be abundantly knowledgeable about their world, about the things they purchase, the people they vote for, the religions they follow, etc. On the other hand, people's capability to get any information they want at their fingertips has made everyone a critic. Not everyone should be a critic. When everyone becomes a critic, trolls are born:
| "I've never played a guitar or studied music before, but I'm pretty sure John Petrucci is over-rated," says Trollface. |
Still, I even hypocritically find myself getting mad when my Internet is slow. And when I say mad, I mean kind of indignant. How dare the computer try to think about something else other than what I'm commanding it to think about. Every time I try to click on a video, and the computer does that thirty second "hold on, I need a minute here" freeze, my outrage is unparalleled. "I don't fucking care about a McAfee update right now! You do what I click on you to do!" Seriously though, the people at Windows, iTunes, and McAfee could take a break every once in a while. Enough updates, says this troll.
I think I'm done talking.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)